Will Mike re-betray the LOSTIES??? - Page 2

Yea he killed her by accident. She just happened to walk in there to get the blanets and she caught him off guard.

I hate Michael! I hope he is the lostie that dies next week.

The chances of the producers killing off Michael right after re-introducing him are pretty slim. Possible, but unlikely.
Although that would be really nice. He's not exactly a very likable character is he?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbeach

I think Mike deliberately killed her and Libby to shut them up..

it may have seemd like a startled reaction...
but I thought it was homicide..each was unarmed

He didn't necessarily want either of them dead.
He needed Ben to get to his son, but Ben was being guarded by Ana Lucia and Michael was getting desperate. He shot her to get her out of the way and Libby appeared right then, startling him, which made him shoot her too. He then shot himself because he couldn't make himself look responsible.

11:59 PM

I've been thinking why I hate Michael. Not so much about his killing of Ana Lucia and Libby but more about that annoying attitude he had towards Sawyer when Others took Walt off the boat. I mean, you're trying to survive in the ocean on some torn piece of the boat in the middle of the night, Dharma shark's swimming just below you and the guy goes get off my boat. What boat?! Dude got some nerves.

So I don't know if it's a matter of betrayal or not, but I wouldn't be surprised if Michael's going to do something weird just for his own agenda. "I want my son!" seems to me just some facade for this guilt ridden egotistic semi father-figure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by flaneuse

I've been thinking why I hate Michael. Not so much about his killing of Ana Lucia and Libby but more about that annoying attitude he had towards Sawyer when Others took Walt off the their boat. I mean, you're trying to survive in the ocean on some torn piece of the boat in the middle of the night, Dharma shark's swimming just below you and the guy goes get off my boat. What boat?! Dude got some nerves.

So I don't know if it's a matter of betrayal or not, but I wouldn't be surprised if Michael's going to do something weird just for his own agenda. "I want my son!" seems to me just some facade for this guilt ridden egotistic semi father-figure.

If Michael only cares about himself and Walt, what do you think would happen if Walt was taken out of the picture?
But I totally agree with you. Michael is definitely giving me some bad vibes.

AP recently interviewed the actor Harold Perrineau
and described the incident as he "shockingly gunned down fellow passangers Ana and Libby to release the evil Ben and to retrieve his son from captivity"

I will reconsider my use of the word deliberate

but would still say its murder not nessarily premeditated

BUT Mike would do anything to save his son
same as Jin saying he would do anything to save Sun
{but Jin would NOT murder his LOSTie companions IMO}

I do think Mike is a dangerous narciss and ego centric to the max ..
guilt and shame MUST be fueling some of his hatred/rage

I also wonder why the writers chose a black actor to be the bad guy
{although Locke is looking increasingly problematic also.}

I do think Mike will be given another chance to redeem himself

I think Mike or Jin will die this wk

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbeach

I also wonder why the writers chose a black actor to be the bad guy
{although Locke is looking increasingly problematic also.}

Are you suggesting that the issue of race might have determined the choice of the moral fabric of the character assigned to some black actor???

I thought the series came to that point long time ago where the moral dichotomy between good- bad/evil proved to be just a reflection of partial information or knowledge of the one who judges. It might be some everyday habit with practical value (!) to label things and people as such, but it just doesn't work like that with the narrative of Lost. As much as I don't like Michael or Juliette or Whitmore etc., none of these or other characters are easy to categorize on moral terms.

'Are you suggesting that the issue of race might have determined the choice of the moral fabric of the character assigned to some black actor???''

I found it personnally uncomfortable for me...and relaize this is delicate subject

I agree the narrative of LOST does not match what I am saying

im talking about the sceen whre the doc takes sayed and dsmond back and sees a pile of blood

Micheal, the spy for Ben is spying as a Janitor, he was th one that put the note in, he also was supposed to clean up the pile of blood but left it to clue Sayeed and Desmond on how bad the Captain was , he was on the corner so they wouldnt recognize him, but they did, However, Sayeed and Desmond wer smart enough not to blow his cover .

now heres something else i think
why would he do this?

Simple Ben ses that Micheal would do anything to get his son back, so he simply goes out and gets the son again, he asks and he blackmails micheal to do it
would you guys agree?