We often hear/see something that seems to be of no importance only to find out later its significance. When the terms of Kate's probation included not leaving California for 10 years, her lawyer encouraged her to decline or bargain for a better deal. Kate took the deal, saying something like "I do ot want to leave CA anyway". This immediately struck me as significant, that accepting this condition would prove to be a big problem in the fututre. I have heard others comment along the lines of - it might present a problem if she decided to go back to the island. Getting back to the island would entail so much risk that violating probation would be the least of her worries.

I think there is more to it than that, but do not know what. So I am asking, if something develops that makes the "no travel" condition of great importance, what will that something be?