Man with the Patch - Page 4

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osgilian

It can't be Radzinsky! Remember Kelvin pointed out the blood stain on the ceiling and said that he only had 108 minutes to bury the poor bastard. So either Kelvin was lying or the one eyed man is some new stanger!!

He had no problem lying to Desmond about the fact that he was fixing his boat, nor did he have any trouble lying about "the sickness". What would deter him from lying about his former partner?

05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lizard2112

That's right, Peg, I noted that in another thread "One Eyed Wonder".

I think it could very well be Radzinsky, and I believe you also pointed out that the mural on the wall in the Swan showed a prominent figure with one eye "X"'ed out...he could the leader of the whole shebang, or a fallen leader just trying to stay alive.

Maybe Benjamin usurped his power and sent him packing.

Also, I don't know if anyone picked up on this, but Eyepatch is seen on the monitor, shuts the monitor off, and moments later Smokey attacks and kills Eko. Eko tells John that his group is "next".

Could Smokey be under the control of this person? He was wearing clothing with a Dharma symbol on it. He might be the guy in charge of the Cerberus security system, or just the current caretaker of that station (The Flame?).

Hmm, I don't know. Lately I've been thinking that the smoke is death itself. Could it be controlled by someone? I don't know. I do recall weird flashes the first time the smoke approached Eko though, like lightening or camera flashes. That was a little odd, but may just be a part of what the smoke is.

I think the theories of the guy with the patch being Radzinsky is pretty good. It very well could be.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenmarie

I think the theories of the guy with the patch being Radzinsky is pretty good. It very well could be.

How the hell are those theories good?? How the hell are they good theories? There is absolutely zero evidence for it, and we know Radskinsky shot himself in the head and have absolutely no reason to believe otherwise. In your opinion, just saying completely random stuff with no evidence to back it up whatsoever constitutes a GOOD THEORY?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Integrated

How the hell are those theories good?? How the hell are they good theories? There is absolutely zero evidence for it, and we know Radskinsky shot himself in the head and have absolutely no reason to believe otherwise. In your opinion, just saying completely random stuff with no evidence to back it up whatsoever constitutes a GOOD THEORY?

Dang!

Here's why I say that is a good theory...It's friggin LOST. Anything can happen. The story that he shot himself could be untrue. If you've been watching LOST, you'll know that there are many twists, and random things happen all the time.

The theory that it could be Radskinsky is an interesting thought since we don't know much about it, or if he's really dead.

However, I'm thinking it could be Jacob. But either is a possibility.

[quote=Jenmarie;16848]Dang!

Here's why I say that is a good theory...It's friggin LOST. Anything can happen. The story that he shot himself could be untrue. If you've been watching LOST, you'll know that there are many twists, and random things happen all the time.
[quote]

It's frigging Lost. It's frigging Lost.

That's your evidence for someone who commited suicide being still alive.

You are a ****ing retard. You think that anything can happen so therefore the completely 100% improbable should be true just because it's a TV show. Random thing happen all the time. You make me sick. You twat.

Patchy is totally not a good guy. If he was... and he is aware of whats going on in the islands. why no help.

you both are funny... the only people we know telling the truth are jack. maybe hurley... locke, sayid and paulo....

point is everyone who DIDNT crash on the island in our same flight... is a liar...

I think you are saying Radskinskys death was faked by the other hatch guy- Who told Desmond that R was dead .Who had stained the roof for "proof" of Rs exsistance/death..Why--This is Lost....Oh,Integrated,Please don't call anyone names just because you didn't explain your theory properly...Sometimes we must engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed enemy,but calling names is shooting blanks,'cause people stop listening...

Integrated - what is wrong with you??? You don't need to call people nasty names!!! Grow up!

[quote=Integrated;16853][quote=Jenmarie;16848]Dang!

Here's why I say that is a good theory...It's friggin LOST. Anything can happen. The story that he shot himself could be untrue. If you've been watching LOST, you'll know that there are many twists, and random things happen all the time.

Quote:

It's frigging Lost. It's frigging Lost.

That's your evidence for someone who commited suicide being still alive.

You are a ****ing retard. You think that anything can happen so therefore the completely 100% improbable should be true just because it's a TV show. Random thing happen all the time. You make me sick. You twat.

Well, now I know who has a problem...

You seriously make me laugh. I'm just stating my opinion, and you're acting really childish.

But we should all try and look for the clues and hints that are Dispersed throughout the episodes. Thats where the discussion gets great cuz everyone catches a lil something different.

So far... Patchy... hasnt done anything in the positive column. Being creepy and then disconnecting the video feed were both Negative things to do in that situation. I think if he was maybe smiling or if his patch was on the other eye... he would have seemed more friendly... and i dunno. maybe trying to use the feed to communicate.... again a positive idea, but patchy chooses the path of the dark thoughts....

I think its best we take the side of skeptic and always allow new characters to earn the trust. We made the mistrake of assuming people were good with Michael.

Never again....